Excellence in Living
Wednesday February 21, 2007
This weekend, we will be treated – if that's the right
word – to endless coverage of the Oscars. We've already had the Golden Globe
awards, the Genies, and the East Coast Music awards. Western Music awards
and television Emmies are, mercifully, not due until fall. The Juno awards
will be presented April 1.
Do you ever get the feeling that if what you're doing doesn't
qualify for some kind of an award, it's not worth trying?
A few months ago, Joan and I went to a piano recital by Sarah Davis
Beuchner, a native of the Bronx currently on the Faculty of Music at the
University of British Columbia. She played Gershwin with a vigor and
virtuosity that earned her several standing ovations.
In that context, we were clearly applauding the performer.
About a year earlier, I listened to massed choirs performing J.S.
Bach's St. Matthew Passion, considered one of the greatest sacred choral
works ever composed. I didn't enjoy it as much as Gershwin – the multiple
melodic lines felt like a wall of sound falling on me.
But I was overwhelmed with awe at an intellect that could hold all
those elements in his mind and weave them together at the end.
In that context, we were applauding the virtuosity of the composer.
Awards for everything else
We have awards for arts. We have awards
for science. We have awards for sports.
Why, I wonder, do we not have any awards for life? For outstanding
examples of what it means to live life fully, sensitively, compassionately,
neither being a steamroller nor a doormat?
It's not the same thing as the Nobel Peace Prize, although a number
of winners might qualify – the Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, Dag Hammerskold…
But not all of them. Mother Theresa of Calcutta reputedly had a
fairly acid tongue for those whose actions failed to live up to their words.
Martin Luther King Jr. has been called a womanizer. Albert Schweitzer could
be difficult to work with.
And certainly the recent nomination of Rush Limbaugh would not
qualify. Limbaugh, in case you missed it on his syndicated broadcasts,
claims that women didn't do as well as men on multiple-choice tests, because
God gave Eve a choice “between multiple choice or multiple orgasms.”
He also declared, “Feminism was established to allow unattractive
women easier access to the mainstream of society.”
And in case you're thinking he limited his scorn to women: “Why
should Blacks be heard? They're 12% of the population. Who the hell cares?”
A target worth aiming for
Most of us will never excel in chemistry
or mathematics, in literature or drama – let alone in insults. We will never
be Oscar Peterson or Meryl Streep.
But every one of us has the opportunity to live our own lives to the
best of our ability – bringing out the finest in ourselves and in those
around us.
Maybe we need an award that celebrates something we can all emulate
in our own small corner of the world – virtuosity in living. |

Jim Taylor
Jim Taylor has more than 40 years experience writing and editing, in
broadcasting, magazines, newspapers, and books. He was for 13 years the managing
editor of a 330,000 circulation magazine; he co-founded a publishing house; he
has written 13 books and has lost count of the number of magazine articles.
Although theoretically retired, he continues to edit two or three books a year,
dispenses advice liberally, and teaches his Eight-Step Editing workshops across
Canada. |